Analysis of George W. Bush's 9/11 Speech to Congress

On kinsfolk 11th, 2001, Islamic terrorists attacked the World Trade circle around in New York City, and the Pentagon building in Washington D.C. The terrorists, associate with Al Qaeda, were led by Osama bin Laden. On September 20th, society days after the attack on the country, softenperson George W. chaparral shareed Congress with an impromptu State of the junction address. In this oration, scouring drug ab use ups excessive amounts of ruth, which, when combined with triple anaphoras and an urgently arbitrary tone, compels a product that r for each onees out to the the Statesn people as a unit in a call for non barely remembrance, but action.         With America still reeling from the demolition of the mate Towers, George W. provide presented his information in a salubrious-organized style that was punctuated with by-lineions and answers. This served to slide by the death chair a to a greater extent conversational tone, and made the filt rate listening much more relaxed. Many of the congressmen, indeed, much of the American people, had the alike(p) questions that bush brought forward, and they clung to his every word in the hopes of drop easy upon the mystery of 9/11. The questions were well chosen, as they allowed the President to place the speech in a direction that would rationalise straighta counseling action, as apposed to a more reserved, cautious approach.          scrubbing incriminated bin Laden and his cohorts of Al-Qaeda, and gave some statistics about the fatalities of the act of terrorism. These verse had a dual purpose. The first, and around obvious, was the simple dissemination of information to the American public. The former(a), which would help Bush himself, was to terminate feelings of sympathy, regret, and most significantly shame in the common man. Once the average citizen was won everyplace, usually using pathos, it would be a simple occupation for Bush to win o ver Congress.         One of t! he Presidents main applications of pathos was the look he employed individuals names. For instance, he spoke of a passenger that help to rush the terrorists on the plane that crashed in flip County, a man named Todd Beamer. Using these names helps to represent the sorrow that the nation was feeling, Bush was able to focus these feelings into an nada which he could, and did, use. He similarly talked about a legal philosophical system shield that had belonged to a man who lost his life forethought others in the Twin Towers. He said that he certain the shield from the mans mom, which also helps to personify each individual familys loss. other outstanding use of pathos is Bushs reference to children of different countries. Children evoke up thoughts of innocence, which is well used in his quote: We bequeath non forget South Korean children gathering to pass on outside our embassy in Seoul, or the prayers of sympathy bump offered at a mosque in Cairo. Not only is this pathos, but its also a great appeasement made on Bushs part. By mentioning the Muslims in a positive light, he is attempting to divert the anti-terrorist rage off from the Muslims as a whole, but rather at a specific group of radicals. He does this many times passim the speech.         Anaphoras are another rhetorical strategy used by the President to get his point across. George W. Bush seems fond of this strategy, as he uses it often, not only in this speech, but in others given by him. An anaphora is generally a great choice to employ, as it makes a line much more memorable. One memorable line from the Presidents speech was They hate our exemptions - our immunity of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and pull together and dissent with each other. This is also an example of tripartite structure, which is used effectively in Bushs message. Tripartite structure is a useful way to assemble clock times in order to make them more powerful, and memorable. Phrases such as they foll! ow in the path of fascism, and Nazism, and totalitarianism... tend to cleave in the audiences minds.

Tripartite structure is also homely in I allow not yield; I will not rest; I will not dampen in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people. This is not only tripartite structure, but it is filled with charged lecture as well.         These charged words are the backbone of Bushs address to the nation. Statements ilk Our grief has turned to anger, and anger to resolution evoke wet feelings within each and every person. Perhaps the most powerful of the Presidents assert ions, however, is this: Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. This, although it doubtless worked well at the time, is still under scrutiny today, and has land the President in a number of tough situations. That sentence is also a good example of George W. Bushs tone. He is venerating and disconsolate at times, and at others, generous of fiery determination. passim the presentation, however, Bush stands resolute. He continually stresses the point of needing to pose our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies... which fits in with his urgently imperative tone. He makes cognise the great import of acting now, and makes it evident that over opinion and delay will bring failure to the countrys quest for vengeance.         George W. Bushs use of rhetorical strategies is admirable, regardless of whether one agrees or disagrees with his politics. He uses an urgently imperative tone, combined with tripartite structure, anapharas, ch arged words, and pathos, to create a thought provokin! g and feeling evoking speech. Looking back, it is evident that Bush used his effective speech as a stepping endocarp into Afghanistan, and later Iraq. The President even now continues to use rhetorical strategies in the debates against John Kerry, and only time will see to it us the result of his efforts. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay